Home
When you look at the cosmic web of galaxies, it is composed of galaxies. Galaxies that form clusters, and superclusters. The known Universe(visible) is rounded, almost "balloon shaped".
A great example to use, in comparison, is the Human Brain's Neurological Mapping.
My theory, is as follows. We, as humans percieve time because of the natural rotation of our planet, and our planet's orbit around our host star. When you look at the known universe on a subatomic scale, even atoms nuclei are composed of smaller objects known as quarks. Atomic smashing facilities are hard at work at figuring out what these particles are composed of, by smashing atoms together, so the answer is not yet known as to what quarks are composed of. The startling similarity between the structure of the human brain(intelligent being in nature) to the relative structure of the cosmos is interesting enough to be compared. The structure of Neurons, and Neuro-pathways is nearly identical to superclusters and clusters bound together by gravity.
It could be very possible that we are just part of the tissue of a brain of a larger being. This being is obviously structured atomically different from us, so this being is not a human. Our perception of time might just be on our own level(earth rotation, earth orbit), where this large being that is walking around has a longer lifespan. However, to that being, time is percieved differently, in relativity to its own environment.
13.5 billion years ago, what we call, "The Big Bang" is known to us as the "beginning of time". It was all born from something super dense and small, then exploded outwards. It went through an early development phase, forming what we know of as "the periodic table of elements". Then the first STARS were born in the next phase, then the galaxies, which then spiraled outwards to form clusters of galaxies and superclusters of galaxies all "bound together by mutual gravity".
This growth is not close to unlike the growth of a human brain when "life is born", a brain is born, a personality is born. It is up to these quarks, atoms, electrons and neutrons to spiral outwards in an infantesimal stage, to adolescent, to adult, only to begin aging....and whithering away. So as we are "whipping around" our star(quark), this large lifeform could be "whipping around" his host star, percieving time totally different from us. This being could be 13 years old to him, but to us, he is 13 billion because of how RELATIVELY fast we spin around our quark....lol.
This is why I find Albert Einstien to be the greatest mind in the history of our species. All because of such a simple theory. Everything is relative. It may be a little "different", but it is still relative. And what I think we are looking at in the night sky is the brain of another being, but this larger being is evolving differently. I dont count out the minds of Stephen Hawking and Charles Darwin. Darwin, specifically hit it on the nose with the theory of evolution. This theory is RELATIVE to each creature's surroundings as to HOW they evolve. All slightly different.
Steven Hawking discusses parallel universes. Which is RELATIVE to the possibility of us USING black holes(IE:atomic nuclei) to "warp" out of this larger being's brain and into the larger being's surroundings, and so on.
Ughhhh,,,,,my universe is tired. lol
A great example to use, in comparison, is the Human Brain's Neurological Mapping.
My theory, is as follows. We, as humans percieve time because of the natural rotation of our planet, and our planet's orbit around our host star. When you look at the known universe on a subatomic scale, even atoms nuclei are composed of smaller objects known as quarks. Atomic smashing facilities are hard at work at figuring out what these particles are composed of, by smashing atoms together, so the answer is not yet known as to what quarks are composed of. The startling similarity between the structure of the human brain(intelligent being in nature) to the relative structure of the cosmos is interesting enough to be compared. The structure of Neurons, and Neuro-pathways is nearly identical to superclusters and clusters bound together by gravity.
It could be very possible that we are just part of the tissue of a brain of a larger being. This being is obviously structured atomically different from us, so this being is not a human. Our perception of time might just be on our own level(earth rotation, earth orbit), where this large being that is walking around has a longer lifespan. However, to that being, time is percieved differently, in relativity to its own environment.
13.5 billion years ago, what we call, "The Big Bang" is known to us as the "beginning of time". It was all born from something super dense and small, then exploded outwards. It went through an early development phase, forming what we know of as "the periodic table of elements". Then the first STARS were born in the next phase, then the galaxies, which then spiraled outwards to form clusters of galaxies and superclusters of galaxies all "bound together by mutual gravity".
This growth is not close to unlike the growth of a human brain when "life is born", a brain is born, a personality is born. It is up to these quarks, atoms, electrons and neutrons to spiral outwards in an infantesimal stage, to adolescent, to adult, only to begin aging....and whithering away. So as we are "whipping around" our star(quark), this large lifeform could be "whipping around" his host star, percieving time totally different from us. This being could be 13 years old to him, but to us, he is 13 billion because of how RELATIVELY fast we spin around our quark....lol.
This is why I find Albert Einstien to be the greatest mind in the history of our species. All because of such a simple theory. Everything is relative. It may be a little "different", but it is still relative. And what I think we are looking at in the night sky is the brain of another being, but this larger being is evolving differently. I dont count out the minds of Stephen Hawking and Charles Darwin. Darwin, specifically hit it on the nose with the theory of evolution. This theory is RELATIVE to each creature's surroundings as to HOW they evolve. All slightly different.
Steven Hawking discusses parallel universes. Which is RELATIVE to the possibility of us USING black holes(IE:atomic nuclei) to "warp" out of this larger being's brain and into the larger being's surroundings, and so on.
Ughhhh,,,,,my universe is tired. lol
